Reactive Inorganic Coatings for Agricultural Fertilizers

ABSTRACT

The invention relates to a coated granular fertilizer, preferably wherein granules are sulfate-based or phosphate-based. When sulfate-based granules, as in ammonium sulfate, the coating substance is an inorganic salt of alkaline earth elements, preferably calcium, such that when applied to the surface of fertilizers, forms calcium sulfate, preferably a calcium sulfate-dihydrate, as a protective coating. For a reactive coating of a thiosulfate, free sulfuric acid present on the granule reacts to provide an elemental sulfur coating. For ammonium phosphate-based granules, coatings may comprise compounds of Ca++, Al+++ and/or Fe+++ salts thereby forming a calcium, an aluminum, an iron, or mixed cation phosphate protective coating. Thiosulfate is also effective with phosphate-based granules which arc manufactured with sulfuric acid. Granules coated according to the disclosure have advantageous properties as the coating can be applied in a specified and sparing manner due to its tendency to adhere to surfaces during the reaction. Coated fertilizer granules of the disclosure are also advantageous in that, with regard to the applied amount of coating, they provide increased resistance to dusting in long term warehouse storage, to moisture uptake and to oxidative heating. Coating components also add nutrients to plants that can provide nutrients over a longer period of time such as a slow-release characteristic.

REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No.16/543,071 filed Aug. 16, 2019, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,870,609Dec. 22, 2020, and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No.62/718,993 filed Aug. 16, 2018, the entirety of which is incorporated byreference.

BACKGROUND Field of the Invention

This invention is directed to methods, systems, and processes for thecoating of granular fertilizers and to the coated granules. Inparticular, the invention is directed to the coating of fertilizerscontaining organic components.

Description of the Background

Granular fertilizers have traditionally employed surface coatings tocontrol dusting and to some degree odors during storage, handling andapplication. Most commonly, various hydrocarbon oils, such as tall oilsand or various oils mixed with waxes, such as paraffins, have beenemployed as coatings for granular fertilizers such as diammoniumphosphate, monoammonium phosphate and ammonium sulfate. These oilcoatings are sprayed onto the surface of the granule and cover all orpart of the exposed surface. They do not react with surface componentsby modifying the specific surface chemistry of the granule. They arevery good for short-term dust prevention and are widely utilized.However, they also serve as an effective surface for the deposition ofmoisture condensation which then solubilizes and transfers plantnutrient salts from the granule through the oil coating forming crystalson the coating surface. These crystals are loosely organized andconstitute a major portion of subsequent dust from said granules. Oilcoatings slowly over time may absorb into the structure of the granuleleaving the surface less protected against dusting. Other granularcoatings may be used, such as urea formaldehyde polymers, urethanes,sulfur and various organic compounds, some for the specific purpose ofintroducing a slow-release characteristic to the inorganic nutrients,e.g., nitrogen, into the fertilizer. Most of these coatings do anexcellent job of preventing dust in the short term but some of these,especially the lighter weight oil coatings, do not protect well in thelong term (greater than 1 month from the time of manufacture) andespecially when they are exposed to daily changes in temperature andrelative humidity. Also, exposure of the fertilizer granules to thehigher temperatures and humidities of the summer months especially inthe South typically generate a higher rate of degradation.

The problem with dusting over long term storage is exacerbated when thegranules contain organic materials, again especially when there arecyclic changes in humidity and temperature. Surface crystal formationand coating oil absorption into the granular structure appears to occurfaster when organics are a component of the fertilizer mass such asdescribed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,947,104; 8,992,654; and 9,856,178.Granules that are initially dust protected gradually lose thatprotection over long term warehouse storage. This protection isespecially at risk when the environment of the warehouse experiencescycles in both temperature and humidity. Additionally, granularfertilizers can suffer from moisture uptake into the structure of thegranule from storage in humid warehouse conditions. When this happensthe granular fertilizers often become softened with reduced hardness.This can spoil perfectly good fertilizers to the point where they are nolonger commercially useful as handling and controlled application to thefield becomes impossible. A further consequence of moisture absorptionis the facilitation of crystal formation on the surface as well asadsorption of the coating into the granule. This process compounds thepotential for poor dust protection, especially on cyclic moisturedeposition on granular surfaces which occur during fertilizer storage.Ideal fertilizer coatings will help protect the granule structure fromdamage via this moisture absorption and or deposition.

Fertilizers that contain organics may be subject to autogenous oxidationcausing granule heating in a warehouse environment due to oxidation ofthe organic components. The inorganic reactive coatings as per thisinvention will reduce this potential through the elimination of organiccoatings and the introduction of a barrier coating which inhibits thetransfer of oxygen into the granule. Further the granule coatings thatform sulfates or phosphates are increasing the fire resistance orself-heating resistance of the fertilizers by the release of water frombound water in the crystal structure of the coating. This can assist incooling the granules and extinguishing the oxidation reaction, since thedehydration of the barrier coating is an endothermic reaction.

Some fertilizer coatings can contain micronutrients, such as boron,calcium, copper, magnesium, manganese, molybdenum, sulfur or zinc thatcan benefit the performance of the fertilizer. Generally, inclusion ofsuch nutrients increases the cost of the coating for the fertilizermanufacturer. Moreover, a properly manufactured organic-containingfertilizer will have an advantage in that much of its nutrient content,especially nitrogen, will be of the slow-release type. Slow-releasefertilizers have been available for many years, but only a few are usedwith agronomic crops. Most are used in horticultural or turfapplications where fertilizer cost is less of an issue. Enhancedefficiency fertilizers (EEF) is a newer term for new formulations thatcontrol fertilizer release or alter reactions that lead to nutrientlosses. The mechanisms or products include fertilizer additives,physical barriers or different chemical formulations. Fertilizeradditives claim to improve fertilizer availability by reducing nitrogenlosses from volatilization, denitrification, leaching andimmobilization. They may temporarily block bacterial or enzymaticprocesses in the conversion of urea to ammonium or ammonium to nitrate.Most of the product development has been for nitrogen (“N”) compounds,although some are for phosphorus (“P”). The phosphorus products caneither be polymer coatings or polymers that shield the P from reactionsthat create less soluble phosphates.

A slow-release fertilizer is one in which the nutrient, e.g., nitrogenas in ammonium ions, phosphorus as phosphate and/or sulfur (“S”) assulfate, becomes available in the soil column at rates slower thanfast-available nutrients as from traditional fertilizers such as urea,ammonium sulfate and di-ammonium phosphate. Slow-release fertilizers aregenerally considered a form or type of Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers,although the two are also equated. This slower action and/or prolongedavailability of the nutrient in the soil column is very desirable andprovides nutrients to the plant throughout the plant growing cycle withthe implication that less nitrogen needs to be applied to the soil orcrop thereby reducing the potential of environmental contamination andreducing the cost of fertilizer usage. Further, slow-release fertilizersare much greener than traditional inorganic fertilizers. For example,slow-release fertilizers not only provide nutrients to plants over muchof their productive crop cycle, they also retain more of the containednutrients in the soil column thereby avoiding loss of the nutrients vialeaching into the ground water. The more advantageous slow-releasefertilizers further, do not volatize their contained nutrients,especially nitrogen, into the environment upon application to the soilenvironment. Traditional inorganic manufactured slow-release nitrogenfertilizers have a price much higher that of ordinary mineral nitrogenfertilizers.

Because the dusting protection afforded by many of the common fertilizercoatings diminish over time a need exists for a fertilizer coating orcoatings to react with a granular fertilizer surface such that thereacted components are better bound or permanently located on thegranular periphery.

Thus, a need exists for an effective, efficient, and economical coatingfor treating granular fertilizers. There also exists a need for avariety of coatings that can be specifically tailored for a particularfertilizer chemistry, such as sulfate- or phosphate-based granules, andespecially when these two basic nutrients contain or are bound withorganics, and that has an enhancement effect on theslow-release/enhanced efficiency of some of the nutrients containedwithin the fertilizer granule.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention overcomes the problems and disadvantagesassociated with current granule coating strategies and designs, andprovides new tools and methods for the effective micro-surface coatingof granular fertilizers.

One embodiment of the invention is directed to methods of coatingfertilizer granules comprising: granulating fertilizer formingfertilizer granules, preferably containing an acid such, by way ofexample, residual acid from the manufacturing process; contacting thefertilizer granules at an acidic pH with an inorganic compound thatchemically reacts with a compound on surfaces of the fertilizer granulesforming a coating; and drying the coated fertilizer granules formingdried granules. Preferred acids include sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid,nitric acid, and/or hydrochloric acid. Also preferred inorganiccompounds contain aluminum (Al), calcium (Ca), copper (Cu), iron (Fe),manganese (Mn), molybdenum (Mo), sulfur (S), zinc (Zn), and/or analkaline Earth metal, which includes at least magnesium (Mg), potassium(K), sodium (Na), calcium (Ca), strontium (Sr), and barium (Ba), whichnaturally occurs as baryte or barite and as a hydroxide as baryta and asa carbonate barium carbonate. Preferred inorganic compounds that containsulfur include, for example, thiosulfate. Examples of thiosulfatesinclude ammonium thiosulfate, potassium thiosulfate, and sodiumthiosulfate.

Preferably the fertilizer granules contain an anionic component and theinorganic compound contains a cationic component. Preferred cationiccomponents include, for example, calcium ions, magnesium ions, aluminumions, polyaluminum ions, strontium ions, and/or barium ions. Preferredanionic components include, for example, chloride ions (Cl⁻), nitrateions (NO₃ ⁻), ammonium nitrate ions (NH₄NO₃ ⁻), hydroxide ions (OH)⁻),and/or acetate ions (CH₃COO⁻) as an anionic component.

Preferably the acidic pH of the chemical reaction is at a pH of 6.8 orless, 6.0 or less, 5.5 or less or even lower. Preferably the inorganiccompound contains calcium ions as a cationic component and chloride ionsas the anionic component. Contacting may also include a surfactant.Preferred surfactants include, but are not limited to dodecylbenzylsulfonic acid (DBSA), an ethoxylated alcohol of C10-C16, sodium laurylether sulfate, amine oxide, methyl salicylate, coco betaine, an anionic,cationic, or nonionic surfactants, and mixtures thereof.

Preferably the inorganic Earth metal compound contains calcium chlorideand forms calcium sulfate on surfaces of the fertilizer granules. Thecalcium sulfate may comprise an anhydrite, a dihydrate, and/or ahemihydrate crystal structure. Preferably fertilizer granules that arephosphate-based are contacted with an inorganic compound that containsaluminum ions, calcium ions, polyaluminum ions, iron ions and/orcombinations thereof as the cationic component, and/or chloride ions(Cl⁻), nitrate ions (NO₃ ⁻), ammonium nitrate ions (NH₄NO₃ ⁻), hydroxideions (OH)⁻), and/or acetate ions (CH₃COO⁻) as an anionic component.Preferably contacting forms an aluminum, aluminum-iron complex, sulfur,and/or aluminum-calcium complex on surfaces of the fertilizer granules.Preferably contacting comprises spraying an aqueous solution of theinorganic alkaline metal compound on surfaces of the fertilizergranules. Preferably the coatings comprise from about 4 to 40 pounds perton of dried granules, or more preferably from about 10 to 20 pounds perton of dried granules, or more preferably from about 4 to 60 pounds perton of dried granules. Preferably the dried granules comprise about 92%to 100% solids, more preferably about 96% to 99% solids, and morepreferably about 98% to 99% solids.

Another embodiment of the invention is directed to methods of coatingfertilizer granules comprising: granulating fertilizer comprisingorganic components comprising fertilizer granules; contacting thefertilizer granules in an acidic environment with an inorganic compoundthat chemically reads with a compound on surfaces of the fertilizergranules forming a coating, wherein: the inorganic compound comprisesCa, Cu, Mg, Mo, Mn, Fe, Al, and/or Zn as a cationic component; theinorganic compound comprises chloride ions (Cl⁻), nitrate ions (NO₃ ⁻),ammonium nitrate ions (NH₄NO₃ ⁻), hydroxide ions (OH)⁻), and/or acetateions (CH₃COO⁻) as an anionic component; and the coating comprises(Al)Cl₃, (Al)chlorohydrate, polyaluminum chloride, (Ca)NH₄NO₃, (Ca)Cl₂,(Fe)Cl₃, (Fe)₃(SO₄)₂, sulfur (S), (Mg)SO₄, (Mg)Cl₂, (Mn)Cl₂, (Mn)NH₄PO₄,(Ca)₃(PO₄)₂, monocal (Ca)(H₂PO₄)₂.H₂O, and/or dical (Ca₂)(H₂PO₄)₄; anddrying the coated fertilizer granules forming dried granules. Fertilizergranules also may have additional coatings of the same or a differentcoaling material, and thereby be multiply coated.

In a further embodiment of the invention, micronutrients, such as boron,calcium, copper, magnesium, manganese, molybdenum, sulfur or zinc orcombinations of these, can be added to the coatings such that themicronutrients become part of the final mass of the resultant fertilizerand that these micronutrients can benefit the performance of thefertilizer.

Another embodiment of the invention is directed to coated fertilizers.Preferably, fertilizers may contain organic or non-organic materials,and also preferably the coated fertilizers may be made by. but notlimited to. those made in accordance with the methods disclosed herein.Preferred coatings include one or more of the coatings as described inthis disclosure.

Other embodiments and advantages of the invention arc set forth in partin the description, which follows, and in part, may be obvious from thisdescription, or may be learned from the practice of the invention.

DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 Schematic of the reactive coating process employing calciumchloride (with surfactant) applied to the surface of anorganically-enhanced ammonium sulfate containing granule as a firstlayer. The diagram also shows that granules may be coated with anoptional outer protective coating.

FIG. 2 Light micrograph and schematic diagram of cross section of acoated organically-enhanced ammonium sulfate containing granule showingsurface coating with embedded ammonium sulfate crystals.

FIG. 3 Graph showing reactive coating on sulfate-based granularfertilizer made according to the process of Example 1 showing enhanceddusting protection over time as compared to uncoated granules.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Conventional fertilizers granules utilize surface coatings to controldusting and to some degree odors during storage, handling, andapplication. Coatings commonly used include hydrocarbon oils, such astall oils and or oils mixed with waxes, such as paraffins. Theseconventional oil coatings are sprayed onto the surface of granules andcover all or part of the exposed surface. Although these coatingdemonstrate good dust prevention, and are widely used, they are only forshort-term dust prevention.

It has been surprisingly discovered that surface coatings can begenerated that provide protection of the fertilizer material andlong-term dust control, without comprising fertilizer usefulness andapplicability. In fact, it was surprisingly discovered that coatings canbe provided that add important nutrients thereby expanding theusefulness and applicability of the fertilizer. According to invention,fertilizers granules to be coated are manufactured or otherwise exposedto an inorganic compound containing aluminum, sulfur, iron, phosphorousor another chemical moiety on their outer surfaces. Preferably theinorganic compound contains the cationic component and fertilizercontains the anionic component. The granules are contacted with aninorganic compound at an acidic pH that reacts with the chemical moietyon surfaces forming a coating. Preferably the acidic pH is 6.8 or less.The coating acts as a shell protecting the fertilizer granules fromexposure to humidity by reducing water absorption, provides increasedhardness, and also serves as a fertilizer component. Coated granules arealso resistant to self-heating and a have reduced odor, as compared tofertilizer granules that have not been coated. Coated granules may bemanufactured with a slow-release or enhanced-release nutrient profile asdesired. The slow-release nutrient profile comprises a reduced rate,reduced amount, and/or differential release of one or more nutrientsfrom the dried granules. The enhanced-release profile comprises theexpedited release of one or more nutrients.

Such coatings can be used on any form and/or type of fertilizer.Preferably, the coatings of the invention are utilized on fertilizergranules, which may be of any structure (e.g., round, oval, square,pellets, or of no particular or mixed structure), of any size (e.g.,with diameters or cubic volumes from mm to cm's as desired), and of anytype (e.g., biosolids, organics, chemicals), and are collectivelyreferred to herein interchangeably as granules or pellets. Preferably,fertilizer granules to be coated may have a sulfur or phosphorouscontent, or sulfur or phosphorous may be added during manufacture or asa separate initial coating. Preferably, fertilizer materials to becoated are granules of organic-containing fertilizers such as, forexample, those disclosed and described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,513,927;7,662,205; 7,662,206; 7,947,104; 8,105,413; 8,557,013; 8,992,654; and9,856,178 (which are specifically and entirely incorporated byreference). Granules to be coated are reacted with an inorganic compoundsuch as, for example, compounds containing aluminum (Al), calcium (Ca),copper (Cu), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), molybdenum (Mo), sulfur (S),zinc (Zn), and/or an alkaline Earth metal, which includes at leastmagnesium (Mg), calcium (Ca), strontium (Sr), and barium (Ba), whichnaturally occurs as baryte or barite and as a hydroxide as baryta and asa carbonate barium carbonate. Preferred inorganic compounds that containsulfur include, for example, sulfate and thiosulfate compounds such asammonium, sodium and/or potassium sulfate or thiosulfate, calciumsulfate, calcium oxylate, aluminum oxylate, ammonium sulfate, ammoniumoxylate, and/or potassium sulfate. Examples of thiosulfates includeammonium thiosulfate, potassium thiosulfate, and sodium thiosulfate. Theinorganic compound may contain an alkaline Earth metal such as those inGroup IIA of the Periodic Table (the Beryllium Group). Preferably thealkaline Earth metal compound comprises magnesium, calcium, barium,beryllium, and/or strontium and serves as a cationic component in thereaction. Preferred cationic components also include, for example,calcium ions, magnesium ions, potassium ions, aluminum ions,polyaluminum ions, strontium ions, and/or barium ions.

Preferably the anionic component comprises one or more of chloride ions(Cl⁻), nitrate ions (NO₃ ⁻), ammonium nitrate ions (NH₄NO₃ ⁻), sulfateions (SO₄ ⁻), oxylate ions (C₂O₄(₂—)), hydroxide ions (OH)⁻), and/oracetate ions (CH₃COO⁻), which is contributed by the fertilizer granules.

Preferably the inorganic compound is combined with the fertilizergranules at an acidic pH. Preferred pH values of the chemical reactioninclude a pH of about 6.8 or less, about 6.0 or less, about 5.5 or less,about 5.0 or less, about 4.5 or less, about 4.0 or less, or even lower.pH values can be easily maintained from about 6.8 to about 4.0, fromabout 6.5 to about 4.0, from about 6.0 to about 4.0, from about 5.5 toabout 4.0, from about 5.0 to about 4.0 and from about 4.5 to about 0.Generally, the lower the pH, the faster the reaction but fertilizers arelimited by the need to be physiologically compatible with soil ecologyand plant requirements

Contacting may be by spraying, soaking, misting, sparging, or otherwiseexposing fertilizer granules to the inorganic component. Preferably theinorganic component is present in an aqueous form. Contacting may alsoinclude a surfactant. Preferred surfactants include, but are not limitedto dodecylbenzyl sulfonic acid (DBSA), an ethoxylated alcohol ofC10-C16, sodium lauryl ether sulfate, amine oxide, methyl salicylate,coco betaine, an anionic, cationic, or nonionic surfactants, andmixtures thereof.

Contacting is typically performed by spraying and upon exit of granulesfrom a cooling apparatus which typically reduce manufacturingtemperatures to between 100° F. (37.8° C.). and 170° F. (76.7° C.).According, the temperature of contacting is in that range as found inmanufacturing processes, such as, for example, from about 100° F. (37.8°C.) to about 200° F. (93° C.), although temperatures are typically fromabout 120° F. (48.9° C.) to about 170° F. (76.7° C.). Warmer or coolerare not harmful to the process, with warmer temperatures serving toincrease the speed of the coating reaction.

Calcium and in the form of calcium chloride is generally preferred asinexpensive and easily dissolvable in aqueous solutions such as water.The calcium ions of the aqueous solution will react with the ammoniumsulfate present in and on the granule surface forming a salt, such ascalcium sulfate as anhydrite, hemihydrate, or preferably a dihydrate asgypsum. The granule so treated then equilibrates with a surface layer ofgypsum which is protective to the granule as well as providing nitrogenand sulfur nutrients for the fertilizer. The aqueous solution of calciumchloride to be reacted with granules is preferably at a concentrationfrom about 10% to about 75%, and more preferably at a concentration ofabout 35% to about 50%. The temperature of the calcium chloride fluiditself can be ambient, e.g., commonly 60° F. (15° C.) to 90° F. (32° C.)or can be heated to a range of about 90° F. (32° C.) to about 160° F.(71° C.). If temperatures are above 90° F. (32° C.) then theconcentration of the calcium chloride can be increased to above 40% upto 75%. The environmental temperature of application can range fromabout 120° F. (49° C.) to about 170° F. (76° C.), but more preferably isin the range of about 130° F. (54° C.) to about 160° F. (71° C.). Suchapplication temperatures facilitate the reaction to calcium sulfatedihydrate on the granule surface with the subsequent loss of the carriermoisture of the calcium chloride such that the granule returns to itsintended dryness of greater than about 97% solids and more preferablygreater than about 98% solids. Application mass quantities of reactivecoatings range from about 4 to about 40 pounds per ton with preferredapplication range of about 10 to about 20 pounds per ton. Suchapplication results in a reacted surface in the range of about 1 μm upto about 50 μm dependent upon the initial concentration of the calciumchloride.

Coatings that can be applied to phosphate-based fertilizers include, forexample, diammonium phosphate (DAP) or monoammonium phosphate (MAP). Thecationic anion preferably comprises Al⁺³ and/or Fe⁺², which may beincluded as a salt, to form aluminum and or iron phosphate salts formingprotective coatings on the surface of granules. The cationic componentmay comprise Ca, Mg, Mn, Fe, Al, and/or Zn or mixtures thereof. Thesecations may be applied as: (Al)Cl₃; (Al)chlorohydrate; polyaluminumchloride; (Ca)NH₄NO₃; (Ca)Cl₂; (Ca)OH₂; FeSO₄-7H₂O; (Fe)₃(SO₄)₂;(Mg)SO₄; (Mg)Cl₂; (Mg)OH₂; (Mn)Cl₂; (Mn)NH₄PO₄; (Ca)₃(PO₄)₂; monocal(Ca)(H₂PO₄)₂.H₂O; and dical (Ca₂)(H₂PO₄)₄ or mixtures thereof.

In a preferred embodiment, the alkaline earth compound may include asurfactant, such as, for example, dodecyl benzyl sulfonic acid (DBSA).The surfactant acts as a dispersant in solution. When thissurfactant-calcium chloride mix is sprayed on the heated granules thesurfactant causes a better distribution of the calcium on the irregularsurface of the fertilizer granules resulting in a superior calciumsulfate coating. Preferably, the mix also reacts into the surface of thegranule. The depth of interaction may be from about 1 to about 200 μm,preferably from about 2 to about 50 μm, and more preferably from about 4to about 20 μm. Other surfactants that can be utilized include, forexample, DBSA, WOOLITE® (cleaning preparations), ethoxylated alcohols ofC10-C16, sodium lauryl ether sulfate, amine oxide, coco betaine, ananionic, cationic, or nonionic surfactants, and/or mixtures thereof. Thesurfactants may be utilized at or above the critical micelleconcentration for each dispersant. Surfactants can also impart adesirable hydrophobicity to the surface which may be one of themechanisms causing less surface crystal formation and absorption of thesurface coating into the granule with granule storage age.

An additional embodiment utilizes aqueous thiosulfate as the spraycoating—preferably as an ammonium thiosulfate, however other cationicelements such as sodium and potassium work as well. The thiosulfate isan anion obtained from a potassium thiosulfate or a sodium thiosulfateor an ammonium thiosulfate or other compounds containing thiosulfate.The thiosulfate reacts with the ammonium ion on the surface of theammonium sulfate or ammonium phosphate-based granules and is convertedto elemental sulfur which then deposits on the granule surface. Thissulfur provides a protective surface layer on the granule and canrestrict the release of nitrogen (ammonium ion) from the interiorgranule. Further, this elemental sulfur is in itself a mechanism ofproviding a slow-release sulfur from the granular fertilizer to targetedcrops. Optimally, the anion concentration range should be between about20% and about 40% with a preferred concentration range of about 25% toabout 35%. Also optionally, an oxalate may be added to the coating. Theavailable heavy metals can be rendered inactive and unavailable byoxalate anion, which provides a valuable attribute to the coating.

The coating process may occur in a coating or cooling vesselspecifically for that purpose typically a rotary drum or a mixer.Alternatively, cooling and coating may be accomplished in a singlevessel which cools the material and mixes the coating agent with thegranules. Coating is with a de-duster or glazing reactive chemicalcompound which minimizes dust generation during transport, storage,especially long term storage—and application. The finished coatedgranule or pellet is then conveyed to storage as finished high nitrogencontaining biobased-enhanced inorganic ammonium fertilizer untilshipment from the manufacturing site. Properly coated and dried pelletsor granules have a hardness range of greater than about 4 to about 12pounds, preferably from about 5 to about 8 pounds, crush resistance toresist dusting and handing during transport, shipment and fertilizerapplication. Coatings also increase resistance to surface crystalformation thereby decreasing the dusting potential.

Another embodiment of the invention is directed to coated fertilizers.Preferred fertilizers include organic and inorganic fertilizers, whichmay be granulated, pelletized or of another form or structure. Coatingsinclude any of the coatings as described in this disclosure andpreferred coated fertilizers may be made, but are not limited to, thosemade in accordance with the methods disclosed herein.

The following examples illustrate embodiments of the invention, butshould not be viewed as limiting the scope of the invention.

EXAMPLES Example 1

To exemplify this disclosure, wet community waste organics comprised ofdigested food waste and manures (also referred to generally as biosolidsor organic materials) are received at a fertilizer manufacturingfacility with a percent solids of about 17.0 percent. The plant is setup to operate at an organics processing rate of 220 wet tons per day. Inthis example, the material is mixed with previously dried organicmaterials to yield a preferred percent solids of about 20% to 26%, ormore preferably about 22% to 24% solids. This conditioned organics mixis pumped into the first vessel for hydrolysis. At the orifice of thefirst vessel, the conditioned organic mix is further mixed with 93%sulfuric acid in an amount pre-calculated to yield a degree of heat ofhydration of about 110° C. (230° F.) and a total of about 17% sulfur inthe finished fertilizer. The contents of the vessel are mixed vigorouslyat a rate of 360 RPM for between about 30 seconds and ten minutes or,preferably for between about two minutes and six minutes. Within thevessel, the acidified mix gradually is forced to the upper quarter ofthe vessel where it is discharged after the reaction. In this firstvessel, proteins from the organics are hydrolyzed to various length ofpolypeptides or, preferably, to monomeric amino acids. Othermacro-organic compounds that are present are also hydrolyzed to smallermolecular forms. Hydrolysis increases the fluidity of the contents ofthe vessel, preferably to less than 1000 cP. This now fluidized,acidified mix is then transferred under pressure to the bottom orificeof a second pressure vessel for ammoniation, wherein it is mixed withvaporized anhydrous ammonia sufficient to raise the temperature of themix to over 150° F. (65° C.) (or alternatively over 300° F. (149° C.)).The internal pressure of the second vessel can equal or exceed 35 psiand is sufficient to cause the concentration of nitrogen (N) in thefinal formulation of the resultant fertilizer to between about 16% to17% nitrogen by dry weight of the finished product. The ammoniated mixis maintained in the second pressure vessel for six minutes of reactiontime before it is discharged through an orifice to the granulator. Thedischarged mix (also referred to as a melt) is slightly increased inviscosity compared to the discharge of the first pressure vessel, butpreferably has a viscosity of less than about 2000 cP. This dischargedmelt is under pressure and therefore enters the granulator to be sprayedonto a receiving bed of recycled fertilizer granules (e.g., crushedfertilizer material or undersized fertilizer material or fertilizer dustmaterial collected from the various dust collectors contained in theprocess air treatment system). The spray coats the receiving fertilizergranules and gradually builds up a series of coatings or agglomeratedmaterial, such that the granular fertilizer is produced in which themajority of the material is of the desired product size. Desired sizesmay be, for example, about 07 mm to 3.5 mm (70 sgn to 350 sgn; “sizeguide number”) diameter granules, suitable for use in commercialagriculture. Subsequent or simultaneously with application of thesprayed coating, an amount of a hardener is applied to the granules inthe granulator. Preferably, the hardener amount is sufficient for thehardness of the finished granules to reach a range of about 5 lbs. to 8lbs. crush strength. This material is then dried to about 98% or moresolids, for example in a rotary drum dryer, and then screened to one ofthree commercial sizes of about 0.7 mm to 1.9 mm, about 1.2 mm to 1.4mm, and to about 2.6 mm to 3.5 mm. Smaller material is returned to thegranulator as part of the recycle bed. All larger material is crushed ina chain mill and also returned to the granulator as part of the recyclebed. A portion of the proper (standard for most agricultural crops)sized product, preferably about 2.4 mm to 3.0 mm for commercial productsize, may also be returned to the recycle bed to maintain the massbalance of the production process. The steps of this process wereperformed under negative pressure to minimize dust and to prevent odorsbeing released into the manufacturing environment. Process air wastreated through a robust odor control system such that no noxious odorswere perceived at the fence line of the manufacturing property. Scrubbednutrients such as ammonium ion, in this example—ammonium sulfate, werereturned to a process water tank wherein it was added to the first mixerto help control the solids content and the fluidity of the conditionedmix entering the first pressure vessel. This maximizes the efficiency ofthe manufacturing process so that the only discharges from thefertilizer manufacturing process are treated condensed water (from themunicipal organic material and any cooling water that may need to bedischarged from the cooling system) along with the treated process air.In the fertilizer manufactured in this example the slow-releasepercentage of nitrogen was about 30% of the total nitrogen in theproduct. This slow-release nitrogen is in the form of an organic matrixin which the positive charged ammonium ion is electrostatically bound toa negative charge on the organic compounds such as polypeptides andamino acids that comprise the core of the matrix. After exiting therotary dryer, the product is passed through a product cooler to reducethe temperature of the product to between about 115° F. (46° C.) and160° F. (71° C.), and more preferably between about 130° F. (54° C.) and150° F. (65° C.). According, the temperature of the coating process isin that range as found in manufacturing processes, such as, for example,from about 100° F. (37.8° C.) to about 200° F. (93° C.), althoughtemperatures are typically from about 120° F. (48.9° C.) to about 170°F. (76.7° C.), with a spray of the reactive calcium chloride in therange of about 30% to 50% concentration in an aqueous solution mixedwith dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid (DBSA) as a surfactant, in the range ofabout 0.1% to 0.4%. The granules retain acid from the manufactureprocess are generally about pH 6.8 or less. The coating on the granulesis about 6# to 40# per ton, but more preferably a coating application isabout 10# to 20# per ton. The temperature of the sprayed granule issufficient to cause the water from the sprayed coating to evaporate withthe dryness of the granule returning to about 98% or greater. The resultis a smooth coated granular fertilizer with enhanced protection againstdusting in warehouse storage.

A schematic of the reactive coating process employing calcium chloride(in this case with surfactant) applied to the surface of anorganically-enhanced ammonium sulfate containing granule as a firstlayer is shown in FIG. 1. The diagram also shows that granules may becoated with an optional outer protective coating. This outer coating maycomprise an oil based or another traditional coating, or a secondreactive coating layer.

FIG. 2 is a schematic showing a light micrograph and diagram of a crosssection of a coated organically-enhanced ammonium sulfate containinggranule showing surface coating with embedded ammonium sulfate crystals.

FIG. 3 is a graph showing that the reactive coating on sulfate-basedgranular fertilizer made according to the process of this example hasenhanced dusting protection over time as compared to uncoated granules.

The product of this example contained a 98% dry granular fertilizer witha nutrient formulation of 17-1-0-20-1-16 (N—P—K—S—Fe-Organic) by dryweight of the finished granules.

Example 2

The conversion of thiosulfate to elemental sulfur is another example ofa reactive coating that enhances slow release of sulfur and nitrogen bymigration inhibition. It further serves as a base coat that reducessurface area for subsequent placement of a final top seal coat for dustand abrasion control.

In this example, organic material was processed in accordance with theprocess of Example 1 through a rotary drum cooling apparatus. At therotary drum, a different approach was taken to produce a reactivecoating for the dry granules. A preferred anion concentration is between20% and 40% with a more preferred concentration of 30%. A solution ofpotassium thiosulfate (50% in water) was sprayed on hot (140° F. to 160°F.; 60° C. to 71° C.) granules such that thiosulfate reacted with freehydrogen ions present on granule surfaces as sulfuric acid (see equationbelow):

(NH₄)₂S₂O₃+H₂SO→(NH₄)₂SO₄+S(solid)+SO₂+H₂O

When the acid is phosphoric, the formula is:

(NH₄)₂S₂O₃+H₃PO₄→(NH₄)₂HPO₄+S(solid)+SO₂+3H₂O

The ammonium sulfate or ammonium phosphate joins with other ammoniummolecules that characterize the surface of these fertilizer granules.These reactions result in the deposition of the elemental sulfur on thesurface of the granules providing a surface barrier to humidity duringwarehouse storage of said granules.

Example 3

In this example, organic material was processed in accordance with theprocess of Example 1 through a rotary drum cooling apparatus. At therotary drum, a different approach was again taken to produce a reactivecoating for the dry granules. At the rotary drum coating apparatus, asolution of iron sulfate (in water at a range of 15% to 40% with DBSA ina range of 0.2% to 3% as a surfactant) was sprayed on hot (140° F. to160° F.; 60° C. to 71° C.) granules such that the iron replaces one ofthe ammonium groups of the diammonium phosphate that is present on thesurface as sulfuric acid on said granules. This reaction results in thedeposition of an iron ammonium phosphate coating.

The use of monohydrate or heptahydrate iron sulfate was used to producethe reactive coating for phosphate based granule. The use of ironsulfate results in the production of a coating of iron (+2)—ferrousammonium phosphate. This is an insoluble salt found as a water insolublefraction for both diammonium phosphate (DAP) and monoammonium phosphate(MAP) fertilizers. An equation showing this reaction with diammoniumphosphate is shown below:

2FeSO₄+2(NH₄)₂HPO₄→2FeNH₄PO₄+(NH₄)₂SO₄+2H+

This is another example of a reactive coating that enhances slow releaseof nutrients contained in the core of the coated granules whilepreventing dust formation from granule attrition.

Other embodiments and uses of the invention will be apparent to thoseskilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practiceof the invention disclosed herein. All references cited herein,including all publications, U.S. and foreign patents and patentapplications, are specifically and entirely incorporated by reference.It is intended that the specification and examples be consideredexemplary only with the true scope and spirit of the invention indicatedby the following claims. Furthermore, the term “comprising of” includesthe terms “consisting of” and “consisting essentially of.”

1. Fertilizer granules comprising: organic material containing ananionic component coated with an inorganic compound containing acationic component.
 2. The granules of claim 1, wherein the inorganiccompound comprises ammonium potassium, and/or sodium sulfate orthiosulfate.
 3. The granules of claim 1, wherein the anionic componentcomprises chloride ions (Cl⁻), nitrate ions (NO₃ ⁻), ammonium nitrateions (NH₄NO₃ ⁻), sulfate ions (SO₄ ⁻), oxylate ions (C₂O₄(₂—)),hydroxide ions (OH)⁻), and/or acetate ions (CH₃COO⁻).
 4. The granules ofclaim 1, wherein the cationic component comprises barium ions, calciumions, magnesium ions, potassium ions, aluminum ions, polyaluminum ions,iron ions, and/or sulfur ions.
 5. The granules of claim 1, wherein thecationic component comprises calcium ions the anionic componentcomprises chloride ions.
 6. The granules of claim 1, wherein the coatingcomprises an alkaline metal, aluminum, iron, aluminum-calcium sulfate,ferrous ammonium phosphate, sulfur, calcium sulfate, calcium oxylate,aluminum oxylate, ammonium sulfate, ammonium oxylate, potassium sulfate,and/or an aluminum-iron complex.
 7. The granules of claim 1, wherein thecoating comprises from about 4 to about 60 pounds per ton of driedgranules.
 8. The granules of claim 1, wherein the coating comprises fromabout 10 to about 20 pounds per ton of dried granules.
 9. The granulesof claim 1, which comprise about 92% to about 100% solids.
 10. Thegranules of claim 1, which comprise about 96% to about 99% solids. 11.The granules of claim 1, which have reduced dust formation as comparedto fertilizer granules that are uncoated.
 12. The granules of claim 1,which are less absorbent to humidity as compared to fertilizer granulesthat are uncoated.
 13. The granules of claim 1, which are resistant toself-heating as compared to fertilizer granules that are uncoated. 14.The granules of claim 1, which have a reduced odor as compared tofertilizer granules that are uncoated.
 15. The granules of claim 1,which have a slow-release nutrient profile.
 16. The granules of claim15, wherein the slow-release nutrient profile comprises a reduced rate,reduced amount, and/or differential release of one or more nutrientsfrom the dried and coated granules.
 17. The granules of claim 1, whichhave an enhanced release of one or more nutrients.
 18. The granules ofclaim 17, wherein the one or more nutrients comprise nitrogen,phosphorus, potassium, sulfur, iron, organics, or a combination thereof.19. The granules of claim 1, which further comprise micronutrients. 20.The granules of claim 19, wherein the micronutrients comprise boron,calcium, copper, magnesium, manganese, molybdenum, sulfur, zinc and/orcombinations thereof.
 21. The granules of claim 1, wherein the organicmaterial is chemically bound to inorganic compound by covalent bonds,noncovalent bonds, electrostatic bonds, hydrogen bonds and/orcombinations thereof.
 22. The granules of claim 1, which furthercomprise an oxylate.
 23. The granules of claim 1, which further comprisea surfactant.
 24. The granules of claim 23, wherein the surfactantcomprises dodecylbenzyl sulfonic acid (DBSA), an ethoxylated alcohol ofC10-C16, sodium lauryl ether sulfate, amine oxide, coco betaine, ananionic, cationic, or nonionic surfactants, and/or mixtures thereof. 25.Fertilizer granules comprised of organic material coated with aninorganic compound, wherein the coating comprises aluminum, potassium,iron, aluminum-calcium sulfate, ferrous ammonium phosphate, sulfur,and/or an aluminum-iron complex.
 26. Fertilizer granules comprised oforganic material coated an inorganic compound that contains ionsselected from the group of chemicals consisting of ions of Na, Ca, Mg,K, Mn, Fe, Al, and Zn.